Tensions flared at Bengaluru’s National Law School of India University (NLSIU) this weekend as the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) moved to block a planned screening of a documentary on activist Umar Khalid.
Key facts:
- Documentary: "Prisoner No. 626710 is Present" by Lalit Vachani
- Screening date: September 14, 2026
- Complaint filed: September 13, 2026
- Advocate Girish Bharadwaj also objected via email on September 12
Objections and Allegations
In a strongly worded statement, ABVP’s Bengaluru wing condemned the event, linking Khalid to several controversies—including the 2016 JNU protests, Afzal Guru commemorations, CAA-NRC demonstrations, and the Delhi riots. The student organization, affiliated with the RSS, insisted that academic spaces must prioritize learning and national integrity over what it termed political propaganda.
"Academic campuses must remain dedicated to national integrity and learning, rather than serving as platforms for political propaganda or glorifying civil unrest," ABVP leaders said.
The urgency in their tone was palpable. They claimed to have submitted a formal complaint to the university administration but had received no response by Sunday.
A Call for Balance
Separately, advocate Girish Bharadwaj echoed these concerns in an email to the NLSIU Vice-Chancellor and Registrar. While acknowledging the value of academic discourse on pre-trial detention, bail, and constitutional freedoms, he argued for a more balanced approach.
Bharadwaj suggested that any discussion should include diverse perspectives—constitutional scholars, legal experts, national-security viewpoints, and importantly, the voices of victims of terrorism and separatist violence. He emphasized that academic freedom must be exercised with institutional responsibility.
What Happens Next?
With the screening scheduled for September 14, the university administration faces mounting pressure. Will it uphold the event as an exercise in free speech, or yield to calls for cancellation? The decision could set a significant precedent for how educational institutions navigate politically charged content.
Comments